托福 托福 15 - Mass Extinctions
题目
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
12.What is the purpose of paragraph 7 in the passage?
  • A.It proposes a decisive new test of the Alvarez hypothesis.
  • B.It presents additional supporting evidence for the Alvarez hypothesis.
  • C.It explains why evidence relating to the Alvarez hypothesis is hard to find.
  • D.It shows how recent evidence has raised doubts about the Alvarez hypothesis.
  • 正确答案:
    答案解析:
    答题统计
    答题统计

    登录 后才可以查看答案解析,还没有账号?

    还没有账号?马上 注册 >>

    阅读原文 中文译文

    Cases in which many species become extinct within a geologically short interval of time are called mass extinctions. There was one such event at the end of the Cretaceous period (around 70 million years ago). There was another, even larger, mass extinction at the end of the Permian period (around 250 million years ago). The Permian event has attracted much less attention than other mass extinctions because mostly unfamiliar species perished at that time.

    The fossil record shows at least five mass extinctions in which many families of marine organisms died out. The rates of extinction happening today are as great as the rates during these mass extinctions. Many scientists have therefore concluded that a sixth great mass extinction is currently in progress.

    What could cause such high rates of extinction? There are several hypotheses, including warming or cooling of Earth, changes in seasonal fluctuations or ocean currents, and changing positions of the continents. Biological hypotheses include ecological changes brought about by the evolution of cooperation between insects and flowering plants or of bottom-feeding predators in the oceans. Some of the proposed mechanisms required a very brief period during which all extinctions suddenly took place; other mechanisms would be more likely to have taken place more gradually, over an extended period, or at different times on different continents. Some hypotheses fail to account for simultaneous extinctions on land and in the seas. Each mass extinction may have had a different cause. Evidence points to hunting by humans and habitat destruction as the likely causes for the current mass extinction.

    American paleontologists David Raup and John Sepkoski, who have studied extinction rates in a number of fossil groups, suggest that episodes of increased extinction have recurred periodically, approximately every 26 million years since the mid-Cretaceous period. The late Cretaceous extinction of the dinosaurs and ammonoids was just one of the more drastic in a whole series of such recurrent extinction episodes. The possibility that mass extinctions may recur periodically has given rise to such hypotheses as that of a companion star with a long-period orbit deflecting other bodies from their normal orbits, making some of them fall to Earth as meteors and causing widespread devastation upon impact.

    Of the various hypotheses attempting to account for the late Cretaceous extinctions, the one that has attracted the most attention in recent years is the asteroid-impact hypothesis first suggested by Luis and Walter Alvarez. According to this hypothesis, Earth collided with an asteroid with an estimated diameter of 10 kilometers, or with several asteroids, the combined mass of which was comparable. The force of collision spewed large amounts of debris into the atmosphere, darkening the skies for several years before the finer particles settled. The reduced level of photosynthesis led to a massive decline in plant life of all kinds, and this caused massive starvation first of herbivores and subsequently of carnivores. The mass extinction would have occurred very suddenly under this hypothesis.

    One interesting test of the Alvarez hypothesis is based on the presence of the rare-earth element iridium (Ir). Earth’s crust contains very little of this element, but most asteroids contain a lot more. Debris thrown into the atmosphere by an asteroid collision would presumably contain large amounts of iridium, and atmospheric currents would carry this material all over the globe. A search of sedimentary deposits that span the boundary between the Cretaceous and Tertiary periods shows that there is a dramatic increase in the abundance of iridium briefly and precisely at this boundary. This iridium anomaly offers strong support for the Alvarez hypothesis even though no asteroid itself has ever been recovered.

    An asteroid of this size would be expected to leave an immense crater, even if the asteroid itself was disintegrated by the impact. The intense heat of the impact would produce heat-shocked quartz in many types of rock. Also, large blocks thrown aside by the impact would form secondary craters surrounding the main crater. To date, several such secondary craters have been found along Mexico’s Yucatan Peninsula, and heat-shocked quartz has been found both in Mexico and in Haiti. A location called Chicxulub, along the Yucatan coast, has been suggested as the primary impact site.


    地质年代中,在一个短期的时间间隔有大量物种灭绝的现象就被称为大规模物种灭绝。在白垩纪时期后期(大约七千万年前)就曾经发生过一次大规模物种灭绝。而在二叠纪时期后期(大约两亿五千万年前)还发生过一次规模更大的物种灭绝。由于当时灭绝的物种很少为人类所知,所以二叠纪时期的大规模物种灭绝受到的关注远远不如其他几次大规模物种灭绝。 化石记录显示,历史上至少发生过五次大规模物种灭绝,造成大批海洋生物消亡。如今物种灭绝的比率和之前五次大规模物种灭绝时期一样高。因此许多科学家推断:当前,第六次大规模物种处于灭绝状态。 是什么原因引起如此高的物种灭绝率呢?有几种假说,包括:地球变暖或变冷;季节型波动的改变或洋流变化;大陆位置移动。生物假说包括因昆虫与开花植物之间的合作式进化或海洋底层肉食动物进化引起的生态变化。这些生物机制,有些在极短的时间内就会灭绝,而有些则很有可能经过长时期在不同时代或不同大陆缓慢地进行。有些假说未能解释在陆地和海洋同时发生的物种灭绝。可能每次大规模物种灭绝都有不同的原因。但有证据指出,人类狩猎以及人类破坏栖息地很可能是当前大规模物种灭绝的原因。 美国古生物学家David Raup 和John Sepkoski 曾经从大量化石群中研究物种灭绝的比率。他们指出,自从白垩纪时期中期以来,灭绝的物种不断增多,大约每隔两千六百万年就会定期发生一次。白垩纪时期后期的恐龙和菊石(的灭绝是一系列此类周期性物种灭绝中更为剧烈的一次。对于周期性出现大规模物种灭绝的可能性,引发了这样的假设:一颗具有长周期轨道的伴星体使其他天体从正常轨道偏离,导致其中一些天体变成流星掉落到地球,撞击时造成大范围破坏。 各种假说都试图对白垩纪时期后期物种灭绝做出解释,近年来Luis 和Walter Alvarez最先提出的小行星撞击假说备受人们关注。根据这一假说,地球与一个直径约为10公里的小行星或者总体积与之相当的几个小行星发生碰撞。碰撞的力量把大量碎片喷射到大气中,在这些细小颗粒沉积之前好几年的时间里天空都是灰蒙的。光合作用减弱会造成各种植物的生命大规模下降。这首先会造成草食动物大规模饿死,接着就是肉食动物大规模饿死。按照这种假说,大规模物种灭绝就会突然间发生。 Alvarez 假说基于稀土元素铱的出现做了一个非常有趣的实验。这种元素在地壳中的含量极少,但在大多数小行星中的含量却多得多。因小行星碰撞而被抛进到大气中的碎片可能会含有大量铱元素,并且大气流会把这些物质带到全球各地。白垩纪时期与第三纪时期交替之间的沉积物的研究显示:在这两个时期的交替时期,铱元素的含量急剧增加。尽管还没有发现过撞击的小行星,铱元素异常却为Alvarez假说提供了有力支持。 按理说,这样大小的一个行星,即使受到冲击碎裂之后也会留下一个巨大的陨石坑。撞击所释放的极度高温使得许多种岩石产生热冲击石英。撞击也会将一些大石块抛出去,在主要陨石坑周围形成次级陨石坑。迄今为止,人们沿着墨西哥尤卡坦半岛已经找到了一些此类次级陨石坑。并且在海地和墨西哥找到了热冲击石英。尤卡坦沿海一个叫做希克苏鲁伯的地方,曾被认为是主要的撞击点。

    留言区中有很多我们对问题的解答喔, 登录后可以查看

    还没有账号?马上 注册 >>

    最新提问
    • wx_6697
      觉得B C 意思一样,不知道选哪个
    • wx_5576
      这道题C为什么对,E为什么不对?
    • wx_5576
      B为什么不能选啊?
    • wx_6697
      TPO30 passage 2 Q5我选的 D,不明白为啥不对?
    • wx_6697
      鑫哥,TPO6passage3Q5 答案是给错了吗?好多人都选A
    • wx_6697
      这题也很容易选错选成了D
    • wx_6697
      这道题A为什么错了
    • 芊儿
      为什么这道题不选c??a中的variety不是应该对应文中的differentiating 吗??求解!
    • wx_1000
      这道题不选E是因为太细节了吗
    • 王金阁
      这个题为什么不选C啊。。。
    • 芊儿
      这道题的D选项不是和文中的better able to reproduce in open settings相对应么??
    • 风荨火
      有大佬解释一下这个为啥选D嘛?
    • 以沫
      请问这个D 在哪里提现?为什么D错?
    • 芊儿
      第六题 的C选择为什么不对,感觉A是明显驳斥啊...
    • wx_6697
      鑫哥,这道题D是从哪里看出来的
    • wx_6697
      这题选的A,根据是Joly’s calculations clearly supported those geologists who insisted on an age for Earth far in excess of a few million years.想问鑫哥为啥不选A
    • wx_6697
      这题我选的是C依据是into a new habitat outside of its natural range, it may adapt to the new environment and leave its enemies behind.C为啥错了呢?鑫哥
    • wx_8861
      F选项的weather-related destruction在哪里体现了呢?原文最后一段的开头Among the costs里的costs是不是打错了?应该是coast?
    • wx_6697
      求问这道题B为啥不选,原文依据:viable seeds of pioneer species can be found in large numbers on some forest floors.
    • 与托福的斗争史
      与托福的斗争史 去解答 去解答
      这题为什么选C?
    • 小雨淅沥哗啦的下
      小雨淅沥哗啦的下 去解答 去解答
      B哪里错了
    • 小雨淅沥哗啦的下
      小雨淅沥哗啦的下 去解答 去解答
      B为啥不对
    • 李浩然
      B选项错误,是因为残缺么?
    • wx_100
      请问在做题的时候如何排除c呢。看了答案,感觉是该选a的,但是当时做题脑子一热,就特别钟爱c,也没看其他选项。。求敲醒。。
    • wx xxxxx
      请问鑫哥,这段开头有写As one pesticide replaces another为什么不是对应a new pesticide is developed?
    • wx_7695
      鑫哥,从哪里看出来这个masks 不是use呀,原文说了wear呀
    • haiyuqiao
      @鑫哥,这题the damage will continue 不应该对应前面的 the target species evolves resistance to it,然后As one pesticide replaces another,不应该是结束了time cycle 吗
    • wx_2065
      鑫哥,想知道E错在哪里?
    • wx_7695
      鑫哥,B选项 cannot extended to earlier geological periods. 原文说的意思是后来的进化无法估计吧
    • wx_2163
      B为什么不选
    • wx_7780
      鑫哥,这个哪里看不use了。BD是修饰错,C是无中生有,怎么能直接选出A?
    • 100
      看到第一句话,以为是中心句就选了A... 为什么不能选A呢
    • 100
      为什么选b?
    • gu33
      请问下 这里选D的原因是 因为 evolutionary approach 对应着 原文的 Rates of evolution 嘛? 这里我选了C。。不是很懂 插入句和 D的关系 求解答
    • 我是啦啦啦
      我是啦啦啦 去解答 去解答
      这个题A哪里错了?是因为主语不对吗?这个C比A多一步推理啊
    • haiyuqiao
      鑫哥,D选项里的19世纪出现了很多假设,原文中并没有提到啊
    • wx_7060
      为什么选a 呢。我觉得a是细节。F哪错了?
    • wx_1105
      我想问一下,这道题为什么不能选A呢?
    • wx_8122
      D为什么不选
    • wx_1655
      f选项哪里说了
    • chaulaw
      鑫哥,原文是below经济损害水平,D是一触发经济损害就用,这也对吗?
    • chaulaw
      interclan婚姻是对的吗?不是只在自己的family结婚扩大家族吗?
    • wx_6697
      鑫哥,这道题答案是不是错了,好多人选D 我也选的D求解答
    • wx_6697
      这道题应该是一道易错题,每个选项的都有,然而我选的A错了,求解
    • wx_6697
      鑫哥,这题的C是怎么得到的?B也没有找到啊?难道不是应该选B
    • wx_6697
      鑫哥,还有这个,好多人选A答案是不是错了
    • wx_6697
      求问D是从哪里得出来的,我选的B呀哎呀
    • wx_4185
      it is difficult to say how far they were intended to be portraits rather than generalized images 这句话怎么理解呢
    • 此楠楠
      请问下这个插入题怎么选的呢?
    • 此楠楠
      求鑫哥讲解下A选项。。。 Even though in error, Joly’s calculations clearly supported those geologists who insisted on an age for Earth far in excess of a few million years.