托福 托福 54 - Overkill of the North American Megafauna
题目
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
5.According to paragraph 2, what suggests that human activity played a role in the extinction of mammals about 11,000 years ago?
  • A.Climate changes that would have favored human population expansion occurred at the time of the extinctions.
  • B.The presence of human hunters had caused animal extinctions in other time periods.
  • C.There was a pattern of climate change earlier than 11,000 years ago that had not caused animal extinctions.
  • D.Harmful climate changes 11,000 years ago would have required humans to hunt larger numbers of animals for food.
  • 正确答案:
    答案解析:
    答题统计
    答题统计

    登录 后才可以查看答案解析,还没有账号?

    还没有账号?马上 注册 >>

    阅读原文 中文译文

    Thousands of years ago, in North America's past, all of its megafauna—large mammals such as mammoths and giant bears—disappeared. One proposed explanation for this event is that when the first Americans migrated over from Asia, they hunted the megafauna to extinction.These people, known as the Clovis society after a site where their distinctive spear points were first found, would have been able to use this food source to expand their population and fill the continent rapidly.Yet many scientists argue against this "Pleistocene overkill" hypothesis. Modern humans have certainly been capable of such drastic effects on animals, but could ancient people with little more than stone spears similarly have caused the extinction of numerous species of animals?Thirty-five genera or groups of species (and many individual species) suffered extinction in North America around 11,000 B.C., soon after the appearance and expansion of Paleo-lndians throughout the Americas (27 genera disappeared completely, and another 8 became locally extinct, surviving only outside North America).

    Although the climate changed at the end of the Pleistocene, warming trends had happened before. A period of massive extinction of large mammals like that seen about 11,000 years ago had not occurred during the previous 400,000 years, despite these changes. The only apparently significant difference in the Americas 11,000 years ago was the presence of human hunters of these large mammals. Was this coincidence or cause-and-effect?

    We do not know.Ecologist Paul S. Martin has championed the model that associates the extinction of large mammals at the end of the Pleistocene with human predation.With researcher J. E. Mosimann, he has co-authored a work in which a computer model showed that in around 300 years, given the right conditions, a small influx of hunters into eastern Beringia 12,000 years ago could have spread across North America in a wave and wiped out game animals to feed their burgeoning population.

    The researchers ran the model several ways, always beginning with a population of 100 humans in Edmonton, in Alberta, Canada, at 11,500 years ago.Assuming different initial North American big-game-animal populations (75-150 million animals) and different population growth rates for the human settlers (0.65%-3.5%), and varying kill rates, Mosimann and Martin derived figures of between 279 and 1,157 years from initial contact to big-game extinction.

    Many scholars continue to support this scenario.For example, geologist Larry Agenbroad has mapped the locations of dated Clovis sites alongside the distribution of dated sites where the remains of wooly mammoths have been found in both archaeological and purely paleontological contexts.These distributions show remarkable synchronicity (occurrence at the same time).

    There are, however, many problems with this model.Significantly, though a few sites are quite impressive, there really is very little archaeological evidence to support it.Writing in 1982, Martin himself admitted the paucity of evidence;for example, at that point, the remains of only 38 individual mammoths had been found at Clovis sites. In the years since, few additional mammoths have been added to the list;there are still fewer than 20 Clovis sites where the remains of one or more mammoths have been recovered, a minuscule proportion of the millions that necessarily would have had to have been slaughtered within the overkill scenario.

    Though Martin claims the lack of evidence actually supports his model—the evidence is sparse because the spread of humans and the extinction of animals occurred so quickly—this argument seems weak. And how could we ever disprove it?As archaeologist Donald Grayson points out, in other cases where extinction resulted from the quick spread of human hunters—for example, the extinction of the moa, the large flightless bird of New Zealand—archaeological evidence in the form of remains is abundant. Grayson has also shown that the evidence is not so clear that all or even most of the large herbivores in late Pleistocene America became extinct after the appearance of Clovis. Of the 35 extinct genera, only 8 can be confidently assigned an extinction date of between 12,000 and 10,000 years ago.Many of the older genera, Grayson argues, may have succumbed before 12,000 B.C., at least half a century before the Clovis showed up in the American West.

    数千年前,在过去的北美,所有巨型动物——猛犸象和巨熊这些大型动物——都消失了。对此事件的一个解释是,当第一批美国人从亚洲迁移过来时,他们狩猎巨型动物以至于使其灭绝。人们在这些人所使用的独特的矛头被首次发现后,把这喜人称为克洛维斯族人,这些人能够使用这些食物源来扩展他们的人口,并且很快的遍布整个大陆。然而,许多科学家反对这种“更新世过度捕杀”假说。现代人对动物确实具有如此剧烈的影响,但难道只有石矛等武器的古代人也同样能造成无数种动物的灭绝吗?在公元前11000年前后,北美洲有35个属或种群(以及许多单个物种),在古印第安人在美洲出现和扩张后不久就灭绝了。(27个属全部消失,另有8个属于局部灭绝,只幸存于北美以外的地区)。尽管更新世末期气候发生了变化,但变暖趋势之前也出现过。在过去的40万年中,尽管发生了这些变化,但像大约11,000年前这样大型哺乳动物大规模灭绝的时期,并没有出现。11,000年前的美洲与以前相比,唯一明显的差异是,这些大型哺乳动物的猎人的存在。这是巧合还是有因果关系?我们不知道。 生态学家保罗•马丁(Paul S. Martin)提出将更新世末期大型哺乳动物灭绝与人类捕食相关联的模式。 研究人员J.E Mosimann与他合作建立了一个计算机模型,展示在大约300年的时间里,条件正确的话,12,000年前在Beringia东部的小量涌入的猎人会波浪式地快速传播到北美洲, 消除野兽以养活其新增的人口。研究人员以多种方式运行该模型,他们总是从11,500年前的加拿大艾伯塔省埃德蒙顿的100人开始分析。评估了不同的北美大型野生动物独立种群(0.75-1.5亿只动物)和不同的人类定居者的不同人口增长率(0.65%-3.5%),以及不断变化的捕杀率,Mosimann和Martin得出了数据,人类从最初开始接触到大型生物到其灭绝的这段时间是在279年到1157年之间。许多学者继续支持这种说法。例如,地质学家Larry Agenbroad已经在地图上标识出了那个时期的克洛维斯遗址的位置以及在考古学和生物学立场下发现羊毛猛犸一体的遗址分布。 这些分布显示出明显的同步性(同时发生)。然而,这种模式存在很多问题。值得注意的是,虽然有几个遗址令人印象深刻,但实际上很少有考古证据能支持它。1982年,马丁写到,他自己承认自己缺乏证据;例如,在那个时候,在克洛维斯遗址仅发现了38头猛犸象的遗骸。在那之后,几乎没有其它的猛犸象被发现;但是仍然有不到20个克洛维斯遗址,其中一头或多头猛犸象的遗体已经被发现,这只是数百万在过度屠杀的情况下被杀害的猛犸象的一些小部分。尽管马丁声称缺乏支持他模型的证据——因为人类的扩张和动物的灭绝发生的太快,故现有的证据较少——但这个论点似乎站不住脚。我们怎么能反驳它呢?正如考古学家唐纳德格雷森指出的那样,在其他因人类猎人快速传播而灭绝的情况下——例如,新西兰一种大型不能飞行的鸟类恐鸟的灭绝——以遗骸形式出现的考古证据非常丰富。格雷森还表明,更新世时期末期美洲的所有甚至大部分大型食草动物在克洛维斯出现后都灭绝了的证据不是很清楚。在35个已灭绝的属中,只有8个可以确切地指定其是在12,000至10,000年前灭绝的。格雷森认为,许多更老的属可能在12,000年前就已经灭绝了,至少在克洛维斯出现在美国西部之前半个世纪就已经灭绝了。

    留言区中有很多我们对问题的解答喔, 登录后可以查看

    还没有账号?马上 注册 >>

    最新提问
    • wx_6697
      觉得B C 意思一样,不知道选哪个
    • wx_5576
      这道题C为什么对,E为什么不对?
    • wx_5576
      B为什么不能选啊?
    • wx_6697
      TPO30 passage 2 Q5我选的 D,不明白为啥不对?
    • wx_6697
      鑫哥,TPO6passage3Q5 答案是给错了吗?好多人都选A
    • wx_6697
      这题也很容易选错选成了D
    • wx_6697
      这道题A为什么错了
    • 芊儿
      为什么这道题不选c??a中的variety不是应该对应文中的differentiating 吗??求解!
    • wx_1000
      这道题不选E是因为太细节了吗
    • 王金阁
      这个题为什么不选C啊。。。
    • 芊儿
      这道题的D选项不是和文中的better able to reproduce in open settings相对应么??
    • 风荨火
      有大佬解释一下这个为啥选D嘛?
    • 以沫
      请问这个D 在哪里提现?为什么D错?
    • 芊儿
      第六题 的C选择为什么不对,感觉A是明显驳斥啊...
    • wx_6697
      鑫哥,这道题D是从哪里看出来的
    • wx_6697
      这题选的A,根据是Joly’s calculations clearly supported those geologists who insisted on an age for Earth far in excess of a few million years.想问鑫哥为啥不选A
    • wx_6697
      这题我选的是C依据是into a new habitat outside of its natural range, it may adapt to the new environment and leave its enemies behind.C为啥错了呢?鑫哥
    • wx_8861
      F选项的weather-related destruction在哪里体现了呢?原文最后一段的开头Among the costs里的costs是不是打错了?应该是coast?
    • wx_6697
      求问这道题B为啥不选,原文依据:viable seeds of pioneer species can be found in large numbers on some forest floors.
    • 与托福的斗争史
      与托福的斗争史 去解答 去解答
      这题为什么选C?
    • 小雨淅沥哗啦的下
      小雨淅沥哗啦的下 去解答 去解答
      B哪里错了
    • 小雨淅沥哗啦的下
      小雨淅沥哗啦的下 去解答 去解答
      B为啥不对
    • 李浩然
      B选项错误,是因为残缺么?
    • wx_100
      请问在做题的时候如何排除c呢。看了答案,感觉是该选a的,但是当时做题脑子一热,就特别钟爱c,也没看其他选项。。求敲醒。。
    • wx xxxxx
      请问鑫哥,这段开头有写As one pesticide replaces another为什么不是对应a new pesticide is developed?
    • wx_7695
      鑫哥,从哪里看出来这个masks 不是use呀,原文说了wear呀
    • haiyuqiao
      @鑫哥,这题the damage will continue 不应该对应前面的 the target species evolves resistance to it,然后As one pesticide replaces another,不应该是结束了time cycle 吗
    • wx_2065
      鑫哥,想知道E错在哪里?
    • wx_7695
      鑫哥,B选项 cannot extended to earlier geological periods. 原文说的意思是后来的进化无法估计吧
    • wx_2163
      B为什么不选
    • wx_7780
      鑫哥,这个哪里看不use了。BD是修饰错,C是无中生有,怎么能直接选出A?
    • 100
      看到第一句话,以为是中心句就选了A... 为什么不能选A呢
    • 100
      为什么选b?
    • gu33
      请问下 这里选D的原因是 因为 evolutionary approach 对应着 原文的 Rates of evolution 嘛? 这里我选了C。。不是很懂 插入句和 D的关系 求解答
    • 我是啦啦啦
      我是啦啦啦 去解答 去解答
      这个题A哪里错了?是因为主语不对吗?这个C比A多一步推理啊
    • haiyuqiao
      鑫哥,D选项里的19世纪出现了很多假设,原文中并没有提到啊
    • wx_7060
      为什么选a 呢。我觉得a是细节。F哪错了?
    • wx_1105
      我想问一下,这道题为什么不能选A呢?
    • wx_8122
      D为什么不选
    • wx_1655
      f选项哪里说了
    • chaulaw
      鑫哥,原文是below经济损害水平,D是一触发经济损害就用,这也对吗?
    • chaulaw
      interclan婚姻是对的吗?不是只在自己的family结婚扩大家族吗?
    • wx_6697
      鑫哥,这道题答案是不是错了,好多人选D 我也选的D求解答
    • wx_6697
      这道题应该是一道易错题,每个选项的都有,然而我选的A错了,求解
    • wx_6697
      鑫哥,这题的C是怎么得到的?B也没有找到啊?难道不是应该选B
    • wx_6697
      鑫哥,还有这个,好多人选A答案是不是错了
    • wx_6697
      求问D是从哪里得出来的,我选的B呀哎呀
    • wx_4185
      it is difficult to say how far they were intended to be portraits rather than generalized images 这句话怎么理解呢
    • 此楠楠
      请问下这个插入题怎么选的呢?
    • 此楠楠
      求鑫哥讲解下A选项。。。 Even though in error, Joly’s calculations clearly supported those geologists who insisted on an age for Earth far in excess of a few million years.