阅读材料
Professor
The claims that the burning mirror would have been impractical and technologicall impossible are unconvincing.
First, the Greeks did not need to form a single sheet of copper to make a large, burning mirror. An experiment has shown that dozens of small individually flat pieces of polished copper could be arranged into a parabolic shape and form a large, burning mirror. The Greek mathematicians knew the properties of the parabola and so could have directed the assembly of small mirror pieces into the parabolic shape.
Second, about how long it would take to set a ship on fire with a burning mirror. The experiment the reading selection mentions assumes that the burning mirror was used to set the wood of the boat on fire, that’s what takes ten minutes. But the Roman boats were not made just of wood There were other materials involved as well. For example, to seal the spaces between wooden boards and make them waterproof, the ancient boat-builders use a sticky substance called pitch. Pitch catches fire very quickly. An experiment showed that pitch could be set on fire by burning mirror in seconds. And once the pitch was burning, the fire would spread to the wood even if the ship was moving. So a burning mirror could have worked quickly enough to be an effective weapon.
Third, why bother with a burning mirror instead of flaming arrows? Well, Roman soldiers were familiar with flaming arrows and would have been watching fo them and were ready to put out the fires they might cause. But you cannot see the burning rays from a mirror; you just see the mirror. But then suddenly and magically a fire starts at some unobserve place on the ship that would have been much more surprising and therefore muc more effective than a flame arrow.
Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific point made in the reading passage.
留言区中有很多我们对问题的解答喔, 登录后可以查看
还没有账号?马上 注册 >>